Home  ›  What Is the Definition of Cubism Space in Art

What Is the Definition of Cubism Space in Art

Written By Wednesday, 27 April 2022 Add Comment Edit

Early-20th-century advanced art movement

Non to be dislocated with QBism.

Cubism is an early-20th-century avant-garde fine art movement that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and architecture. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, cleaved up and reassembled in an abstracted course—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the subject in a greater context.[1] Cubism has been considered the most influential fine art motility of the 20th century.[2] [3] The term is broadly used in association with a broad variety of art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or near Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.

The movement was pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[4] One chief influence that led to Cubism was the representation of iii-dimensional grade in the belatedly works of Paul Cézanne.[five] A retrospective of Cézanne's paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by ii commemorative retrospectives after his expiry in 1907.[half-dozen]

In France, offshoots of Cubism adult, including Orphism, abstruse art and later Purism.[7] [8] The impact of Cubism was far-reaching and wide-ranging. In France and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Art Deco developed in response to Cubism. Early Futurist paintings hold in common with Cubism the fusing of the by and the present, the representation of different views of the discipline pictured at the aforementioned time or successively, also called multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[ix] while Constructivism was influenced by Picasso's technique of constructing sculpture from separate elements.[10] Other common threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modern life.

History [edit]

Historians have divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the start phase of Cubism, known as Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined by Juan Gris a posteriori,[11] was both radical and influential as a curt merely highly meaning art motion between 1910 and 1912 in French republic. A 2nd phase, Synthetic Cubism, remained vital until around 1919, when the Surrealist motility gained popularity. English fine art historian Douglas Cooper proposed another scheme, describing three phases of Cubism in his volume, The Cubist Epoch. Co-ordinate to Cooper at that place was "Early on Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the move was initially developed in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the second phase being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which time Juan Gris emerged as an important exponent (after 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Tardily Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) equally the last stage of Cubism equally a radical avant-garde movement.[12] Douglas Cooper's restrictive use of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a lesser extent) implied an intentional value judgement.[5]

Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Figure dans united nations Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on sail, 92.1 × 73 cm, Tate Modern, London

Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]

Cubism burgeoned betwixt 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso's 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has oft been considered a proto-Cubist work.

In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque'due south exhibition at Kahnweiler's gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles chosen Braque a daring man who despises form, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[14] [15]

Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the time, "Braque has just sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting made of piddling cubes".[15] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse'due south words and spoke of Braque'southward niggling cubes. The motif of the viaduct at 50'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce three paintings marked by the simplification of form and deconstruction of perspective.[16]

Georges Braque'south 1908 Houses at L'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes fabricated by Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, as the start Cubist paintings. The first organized group exhibition by Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the jump of 1911 in a room chosen 'Salle 41'; it included works past Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, still no works by Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[five]

Past 1911 Picasso was recognized equally the inventor of Cubism, while Braque's importance and precedence was argued later, with respect to his treatment of infinite, volume and mass in the Fifty'Estaque landscapes. But "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to be called Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Light-green: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[5]

The assertion that the Cubist depiction of space, mass, time, and volume supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the canvas was made past Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler as early equally 1920,[18] but it was subject field to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, particularly past Clement Greenberg.[19]

Contemporary views of Cubism are circuitous, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were too distinct from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered merely secondary to them. Culling interpretations of Cubism have therefore developed. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were later associated with the "Salle 41" artists, e.g., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who beginning in late 1911 formed the core of the Section d'Or (or the Puteaux Group); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine besides as Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such as Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (after 1916), María Blanchard (after 1916) and Georges Valmier (afterwards 1918). More fundamentally, Christopher Light-green argues that Douglas Cooper'south terms were "after undermined past interpretations of the piece of work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[5]

John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram being a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram need not eschew sure aspects of advent just these too will be treated as signs not as imitations or recreations."[twenty]

Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]

Albert Gleizes, 50'Homme au Balcon, Man on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on canvas, 195.6 × 114.9 cm (77 × 45 i/4 in.), Philadelphia Museum of Fine art. Completed the aforementioned year that Albert Gleizes co-authored the book Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Arsenal show, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913

At that place was a distinct difference between Kahnweiler'southward Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a lesser extent) gained the support of a single committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an almanac income for the exclusive right to buy their works. Kahnweiler sold but to a small circle of connoisseurs. His support gave his artists the freedom to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained there until after the First World War. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[v]

In contrast, the Salon Cubists built their reputation primarily by exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major not-academic Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more than aware of public response and the demand to communicate.[5] Already in 1910 a group began to class which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier's studio nigh the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées oft included writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other young artists, the group wanted to emphasise a research into course, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist emphasis on colour.[21]

Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), fabricated a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier as "ignorant geometers, reducing the homo body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months later, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was subsequently reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]

The first public controversy generated past Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the bound of 1911. This showing past Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attention of the general public for the first fourth dimension. Amongst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Belfry, Bout Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]

The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911. Picasso'due south 1908 Seated Woman (Meditation) is reproduced along with a photo of the creative person in his studio (upper left). Metzinger'due south Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced top right. Likewise reproduced are works by Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photograph of Braque

At the Salon d'Automne of the same year, in addition to the Indépendants grouping of Salle 41, were exhibited works by André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the October 8, 1911 issue of The New York Times. This article was published a twelvemonth subsequently Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and two years prior to the Arsenal Show, which introduced astonished Americans, accustomed to realistic art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times article portrayed works past Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated earlier 1909; not exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The article was titled The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Autumn Salon and subtitled Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Art Exhibition – What Its Followers Attempt to Do. [27] [28]

Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is alluring so much attention every bit the boggling productions of the then-called "Cubist" school. In fact, dispatches from Paris propose that these works are hands the main feature of the exhibition. [...]

In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is fairly respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases earlier which Paris has stood and now again stands in blank amazement.

What do they hateful? Have those responsible for them taken leave of their senses? Is information technology art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]

Salon des Indépendants [edit]

The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (20 March to 16 May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself caused a scandal, even amongst the Cubists. Information technology was in fact rejected by the hanging committee, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the work was shown in the Salon de la Section d'Or in October 1912 and the 1913 Armory Evidence in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and one-time colleagues for censoring his work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new add-on to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Art Institute of Chicago), while Metzinger's ii showings included La Femme au Cheval (Woman with a horse) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Denmark).[30] Delaunay's awe-inspiring La Ville de Paris (Musée d'art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger'due south La Noce, The Hymeneals (Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris), were also exhibited.

Galeries Dalmau [edit]

In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the first alleged group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Fine art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, 20 April to 10 May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works past 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral's clan with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the newspaper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp'southward Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 was exhibited for the beginning time.[39]

Extensive media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) before, during and later on the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau equally a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, it was non e'er positive. Articles were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [40] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a series of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau evidence: "No doubt that the exhibition produced a strong mayhem in the public, who welcomed it with a lot of suspicion.[42]

Salon d'Automne [edit]

The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the use of government owned buildings, such as the Grand Palais, to showroom such artwork. The indignation of the politician Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front page of Le Periodical, five October 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Council of Paris, leading to a contend in the Chambre des Députés about the use of public funds to provide the venue for such art.[44] The Cubists were defended past the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]

It was against this background of public acrimony that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published by Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English and Russian in 1913).[47] Amid the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier's vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked past Bears) now at Rhode Isle School of Design Museum, Joseph Csaky's Deux Femme, 2 Women (a sculpture at present lost), in addition to the highly abstract paintings by Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Jump) (Museum of Modern Art, New York).

Abstraction and the ready-made [edit]

The most extreme forms of Cubism were not those practiced by Picasso and Braque, who resisted total brainchild. Other Cubists, past dissimilarity, especially František Kupka, and those considered Orphists by Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accustomed brainchild by removing visible subject matter entirely. Kupka's two entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstract (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 developed an expressive and allusive brainchild dedicated to complex emotional and sexual themes. Starting time in 1912 Delaunay painted a series of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed by a series entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with bright prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his departure from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-complete. In 1913–14 Léger produced a serial entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a like stress to color, line and form. His Cubism, despite its abstract qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and modern life. Apollinaire supported these early on developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the subject was vacated. Merely in spite of his use of the term Orphism these works were so different that they defy attempts to place them in a unmarried category.[5]

Also labeled an Orphist past Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for another extreme evolution inspired past Cubism. The ready-fabricated arose from a joint consideration that the work itself is considered an object (just equally a painting), and that it uses the textile detritus of the world (equally collage and papier collé in the Cubist construction and Assemblage). The next logical stride, for Duchamp, was to nowadays an ordinary object equally a self-sufficient work of fine art representing only itself. In 1913 he attached a bicycle wheel to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a canteen-drying rack as a sculpture in its own correct.[five]

Department d'Or [edit]

The Department d'Or, also known as Groupe de Puteaux, founded by some of the most conspicuous Cubists, was a collective of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, active from 1911 through about 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Department d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, October 1912, was arguably the nigh important pre-Globe War I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a broad audience. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their development from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the allure of a Cubist retrospective.[48]

The group seems to have adopted the proper noun Section d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism adult in parallel past Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to bear witness that Cubism, rather than being an isolated art-form, represented the continuation of a grand tradition (indeed, the gilded ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of diverse interests for at to the lowest degree 2,400 years).[49]

The idea of the Department d'Or originated in the course of conversations betwixt Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The group'southward title was suggested by Villon, after reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci'south Trattato della Pittura by Joséphin Péladan.

During the tardily 19th and early 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American fine art. Artists such as Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired by the stark power and simplicity of styles of those foreign cultures. Around 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a time when both artists had recently acquired an interest in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, perchance leading to Picasso entering a new period in his work by 1907, marked past the influence of Greek, Iberian and African fine art. Picasso's paintings of 1907 have been characterized as Protocubism, as notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the antecedent of Cubism.[13]

The art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were especially influential to the formation of Cubism and particularly of import to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[50] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is generally referred to as the first Cubist motion-picture show. This is an exaggeration, for although it was a major first step towards Cubism it is not yet Cubist. The disruptive, expressionist chemical element in it is even opposite to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the world in a detached, realistic spirit. Yet, the Demoiselles is the logical moving picture to take every bit the starting indicate for Cubism, because it marks the birth of a new pictorial idiom, considering in information technology Picasso violently overturned established conventions and because all that followed grew out of information technology."[13]

The most serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles equally the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar caption "fails to give adequate consideration to the complexities of a flourishing art that existed just earlier and during the menstruum when Picasso's new painting developed."[51] Between 1905 and 1908, a witting search for a new mode acquired rapid changes in fine art beyond France, Germany, The netherlands, Italy, and Russia. The Impressionists had used a double point of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who also admired Cézanne) flattened the picture aeroplane, reducing their subjects to uncomplicated geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist structure and subject matter, most notably to be seen in the works of Georges Seurat (e.m., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was some other important influence. There were besides parallels in the evolution of literature and social thought.[51]

In addition to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to be found in the ii distinct tendencies of Cézanne'south later work: first his breaking of the painted surface into pocket-size multifaceted areas of paint, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given past binocular vision, and second his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. However, the cubists explored this concept further than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a single picture plane, as if the objects had all their faces visible at the same fourth dimension. This new kind of delineation revolutionized the mode objects could be visualized in painting and art.

The historical report of Cubism began in the late 1920s, drawing at showtime from sources of limited data, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. It came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler'south volume Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "analytical" and "constructed" which afterwards emerged have been widely accepted since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred after the facts they identify. Neither phase was designated equally such at the time corresponding works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism as Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our merely fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that limited definition."[51]

The traditional interpretation of "Cubism", formulated post facto as a means of understanding the works of Braque and Picasso, has affected our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. It is difficult to utilize to painters such equally Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose fundamental differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to telephone call them Cubists at all. According to Daniel Robbins, "To suggest that merely because these artists adult differently or varied from the traditional design they deserved to be relegated to a secondary or satellite role in Cubism is a profound mistake."[51]

The history of the term "Cubism" usually stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connection with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice past the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a similar context. All the same, the word "cube" was used in 1906 by some other critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference non to Picasso or Braque but rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:

"Grand. Metzinger is a mosaicist like G. Signac but he brings more precision to the cutting of his cubes of colour which appear to take been made mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]

The critical use of the give-and-take "cube" goes back at least to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Fine art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a large and square pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. One even wonders why the artist has not used cubes of solid matter diversely colored: they would make pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]

The term Cubism did not come into full general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accepted the term on behalf of a group of artists invited to exhibit at the Brussels Indépendants. The following year, in preparation for the Salon de la Department d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an effort to dispel the confusion raging around the word, and every bit a major defence of Cubism (which had caused a public scandal following the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims as artists, this piece of work was the get-go theoretical treatise on Cubism and it still remains the clearest and most intelligible. The result, not solely a collaboration betwixt its two authors, reflected discussions by the circle of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. It mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of information technology were read prior to publication.[v] [51] The concept adult in Du "Cubisme" of observing a subject from different points in space and time simultaneously, i.e., the human action of moving around an object to seize it from several successive angles fused into a single image (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a generally recognized device used by the Cubists.[56]

The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" by Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a collection of reflections and commentaries by Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso beginning in 1905, and Braque beginning in 1907, only gave every bit much attention to artists such as Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[5]

The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to show the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their work comprehensible to a broad audition (art critics, art collectors, art dealers and the full general public). Undoubtedly, due to the great success of the exhibition, Cubism became avant-garde movement recognized as a genre or way in art with a specific common philosophy or goal.[48]

Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]

A significant modification of Cubism between 1914 and 1916 was signaled by a shift towards a stiff emphasis on big overlapping geometric planes and flat surface activeness. This group of styles of painting and sculpture, peculiarly significant between 1917 and 1920, was proficient by several artists; especially those nether contract with the art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of order reflected in these works, led to its being referred to by the critic Maurice Raynal as 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested past Cubists prior to the showtime of World War I—such as the time, dynamism of modern life, the occult, and Henri Bergson'south concept of duration—had now been vacated, replaced by a purely formal frame of reference.[57]

Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à l'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—by those who served the military machine and past those who remained in the noncombatant sector—to escape the realities of the Bully War, both during and straight following the conflict. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French gild and French civilization.[5]

Cubism after 1918 [edit]

The nigh innovative period of Cubism was before 1914[ citation needed ]. Afterwards Earth War I, with the back up given past the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned as a fundamental issue for artists, and continued as such until the mid-1920s when its avant-garde status was rendered questionable by the emergence of geometric abstraction and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, fifty-fifty well afterwards 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In French republic, withal, Cubism experienced a decline start in well-nigh 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited not only the artists stranded by Kahnweiler'south exile but others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de 50'Attempt Moderne in Paris. Attempts were made by Louis Vauxcelles to debate that Cubism was dead, but these exhibitions, along with a well-organized Cubist show at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the same year, demonstrated it was still alive.[5]

The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the appearance from most 1917–24 of a coherent trunk of theoretical writing by Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, amidst the artists, past Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative work either exclusively or alongside Cubist work—experienced by many artists during this catamenia (chosen Neoclassicism) has been linked to the trend to evade the realities of the war and also to the cultural potency of a classical or Latin prototype of France during and immediately post-obit the war. Cubism after 1918 can be seen as part of a wide ideological shift towards conservatism in both French club and civilization. Nevertheless, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both within the oeuvre of individual artists, such as Gris and Metzinger, and across the work of artists as different from each other equally Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism equally a publicly debated motility became relatively unified and open to definition. Its theoretical purity made it a judge confronting which such diverse tendencies as Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and abstraction could be compared.[5]

Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914

Influence in Asia [edit]

Nippon and Communist china were among the first countries in Asia to be influenced past Cubism. Contact first occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese fine art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for case those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought back with them both an understanding of modern fine art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu's Cocky Portrait with Scarlet Eyes (1912) and Fang Ganmin's Tune in Autumn (1934).[59] [60]

Interpretation [edit]

Intentions and criticism [edit]

The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more than a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their piece of work. "It is by no means articulate, in any case," wrote Christopher Green, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their development of such techniques as faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well take arrived at such practices with little noesis of 'true' Cubism in its early on stages, guided above all by their own understanding of Cézanne." The works exhibited past these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended beyond the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, even so-life and landscape—favored by Picasso and Braque to include large-calibration modern-life subjects. Aimed at a large public, these works stressed the use of multiple perspective and complex planar faceting for expressive effect while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[five]

In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of fourth dimension to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'elapsing' proposed by the philosopher Henri Bergson according to which life is subjectively experienced as a continuum, with the by flowing into the present and the nowadays merging into the future. The Salon Cubists used the faceted treatment of solid and space and effects of multiple viewpoints to convey a physical and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions between past, present and future. One of the major theoretical innovations fabricated past the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[5] drawing to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of separate spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective developed during the Renaissance was vacated. The subject matter was no longer considered from a specific point of view at a moment in time, but built following a option of successive viewpoints, i.east., every bit if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the eye complimentary to roam from one to the other.[56]

This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative motion) is pushed to a loftier degree of complexity in Metzinger'southward Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' awe-inspiring Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Section d'Or; Le Fauconnier's Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay's City of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These aggressive works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger's The Wedding, also shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave course to the notion of simultaneity by presenting different motifs as occurring within a unmarried temporal frame, where responses to the by and present interpenetrate with collective forcefulness. The conjunction of such subject matter with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early Futurist paintings by Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves made in response to early Cubism.[9]

Cubism and modern European art was introduced into the United States at the now legendary 1913 Armory Bear witness in New York Urban center, which then traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Armory show Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Caput of a Woman (Fernande) (1909–10), Les Arbres (1907) amongst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited seven important and big drypoints, while his brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and L'Homme au balcon (1912), two highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko besides contributed examples of their cubist works.

Cubist sculpture [edit]

Frontal view of the same bronze cast, twoscore.five × 23 × 26 cm

These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]

Only as in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne'south reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And just every bit in painting, information technology became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.

Cubist sculpture adult in parallel to Cubist painting. During the autumn of 1909 Picasso sculpted Head of a Adult female (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative space and vice versa. According to Douglas Cooper: "The first true Cubist sculpture was Picasso'southward impressive Woman's Caput, modeled in 1909–10, a counterpart in 3 dimensions to many similar analytical and faceted heads in his paintings at the time."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited past Alexander Archipenko in 1912–13, for example in Woman Walking.[five] Joseph Csaky, after Archipenko, was the first sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and and then in 1914 by Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]

Indeed, Cubist construction was equally influential as whatever pictorial Cubist innovation. It was the stimulus behind the proto-Constructivist work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-point for the entire constructive trend in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[v]

Architecture [edit]

Le Corbusier, Assembly edifice, Chandigarh, Republic of india

Cubism formed an important link betwixt early-20th-century art and architecture.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships between avant-garde practices in painting, sculpture and compages had early ramifications in French republic, Frg, the Netherlands and Czechoslovakia. Though there are many points of intersection between Cubism and architecture, only a few directly links between them can be drawn. Virtually ofttimes the connections are made past reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of class, spatial ambivalence, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]

Architectural interest in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of three-dimensional form, using simple geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Diverse elements could be superimposed, made transparent or penetrate i another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had become an influential factor in the development of modern architecture from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such as Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of building design, the utilise of materials appropriate to industrial production, and the increased use of drinking glass.[66]

Cubism was relevant to an architecture seeking a style that needed not refer to the past. Thus, what had become a revolution in both painting and sculpture was applied every bit part of "a profound reorientation towards a inverse world".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in avant-garde compages. The influential De Stijl movement embraced the aesthetic principles of Neo-plasticism adult by Piet Mondrian under the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was also linked by Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. However, the linking of basic geometric forms with inherent beauty and ease of industrial awarding—which had been prefigured by Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (amend known as Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier's ambition had been to translate the backdrop of his own manner of Cubism to architecture. Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier concentrated his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies soon advanced into many different architectural projects.[68]

La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House) [edit]

Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Study for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist House). Paradigm published in Les Peintres Cubistes, by Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913

Le Salon Bourgeois, designed by André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts section of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger's Femme à l'Éventail on the left wall

At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that quickly became known as Maison Cubiste (Cubist House), with compages past Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior decoration by André Mare along with a grouping of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the assemblage of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote about the autonomous nature of art, stressing the point that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of art. Decorative work, to them, was the "antonym of the picture show". "The true picture" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être within itself. Information technology tin can exist moved from a church building to a drawing-room, from a museum to a study. Substantially independent, necessarily complete, it need not immediately satisfy the mind: on the contrary, it should lead information technology, petty past little, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative light resides. It does not harmonize with this or that ensemble; information technology harmonizes with things in general, with the universe: it is an organism...".[69]

La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model house, with a facade, a staircase, wrought iron banisters, and 2 rooms: a living room—the Salon Bourgeois, where paintings by Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Woman with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a bedroom. It was an example of L'art décoratif, a home inside which Cubist art could exist displayed in the comfort and style of modern, bourgeois life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed by Duchamp-Villon, to the two furnished rooms.[70] This architectural installation was later exhibited at the 1913 Armory Show, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York exhibit as Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]

Jacques Doucet's hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine

The furnishings, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed by André Mare, and were early on examples of the influence of cubism on what would become Art Deco. They were composed of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.

Mare called the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Bourgeois. Léger described this proper noun every bit 'perfect'. In a letter to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely first-class for the states, actually fantabulous. People will encounter Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very important.[2]

"Mare'southward ensembles were accustomed as frames for Cubist works because they allowed paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Green wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the involvement not only of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, but of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare's former friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]

In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the decoration of a Studio House, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed past the builder Paul Ruaud and owned by the French style designer Jacques Doucet, besides a collector of Post-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought straight from Picasso'south studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet'due south staircase,[75] Lipchitz made the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis made a Cubist rug.[76] [77] [78]

Czech Cubist architecture [edit]

The original Cubist architecture is very rare. Cubism was applied to compages only in Bohemia (today Czechia) and particularly in its upper-case letter, Prague.[79] [80] Czech architects were the kickoff and only ones to always design original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the about part between 1910 and 1914, simply the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were also built after World War I. Later on the war, the architectural style called Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist architecture with round shapes.[82]

In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the matter and calm contained in it, through a creative thought, so that the result would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should be achieved past shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, by arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-like units, reminiscent of the then-called diamond cut, or fifty-fifty cavernous that are reminiscent of the late Gothic architecture. In this way, the entire surfaces of the facades including even the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles as well as other architectural ornaments accomplish a three-dimensional class. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were also created, e. g. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects likewise designed Cubist furniture.

The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked mostly in Prague but also in other Bohemian towns. The best-known Cubist building is the House of the Black Madonna in the Old Town of Prague built in 1912 by Josef Gočár with the only Cubist café in the world, M Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the entrance pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses under Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has also been preserved near the Wenceslas Foursquare, designed by Emil Králíček in 1912, who also built the Diamond House in the New Town of Prague around 1913.

Cubism in other fields [edit]

The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, outside painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein employ repetition and repetitive phrases every bit edifice blocks in both passages and whole chapters. Virtually of Stein's important works employ this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Not merely were they the first important patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were also important influences on Cubism every bit well. In turn, Picasso was an important influence on Stein's writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner'southward 1930 novel As I Lay Dying tin can be read as an interaction with the cubist mode. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of 15 characters which, when taken together, produce a single cohesive torso.

The poets generally associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. Equally American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in poetry "is the witting, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new artistic entity made self-sufficient by its rigorous architecture. This is quite unlike from the free association of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Even so, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the later movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding fellow member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our firsthand elderberry, the exemplary poet."[84] Though not as well remembered as the Cubist painters, these poets continue to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett have recently produced new translations of Reverdy's work. Wallace Stevens' "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" is likewise said to demonstrate how cubism's multiple perspectives can exist translated into poetry.[85]

John Berger said: "It is most impossible to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts every bit not bad every bit that which took place in the early Renaissance. Its effects on later fine art, on flick, and on architecture are already and so numerous that we inappreciably notice them."[86]

Gallery [edit]

  • Pablo Picasso, 1913–14, Femme assise dans united nations fauteuil (Eva), Woman in an Armchair, oil on canvas, 149.ix x 99.4 cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Collection

  • Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on sheet, 142 10 100.3 cm, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Ohio

  • Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de L'Accordéon (The Accordion Player), Museo del Novecento, Milan

Press manufactures and reviews [edit]

  • (center) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Man with Piping), Carnegie Museum of Fine art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano Ii), (correct) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, 13 March 1914

  • Paintings by Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Woman in Bluish, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Fine art Gallery; and sculpture by Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, northward. 1529, 13 Oct 1912

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, Fifty'coach. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, xiv March 1920

  • Paintings past Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Man on a Balustrade, L'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–13, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (connected), due north. 1916, fourteen March 1920

  • Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Study for Man in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; August Agero, sculpture, Bust; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Glasses, or Banjo and Glasses. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912

  • Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Souvenir d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, i December 1912

  • Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, 9 March 1913. Picabia held his first i-human being evidence in New York, Exhibition of New York studies by Francis Picabia, at 291 art gallery (formerly Lilliputian Galleries of the Photo-Secession), March 17 - April 5, 1913

Run into besides [edit]

  • Fourth dimension in fine art
  • Precisionism
  • Proto-Cubism
  • Rayonism
  • Section d'Or

References [edit]

  1. ^ Jean Metzinger, Note sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), October–Nov 1910
  2. ^ a b Christopher Green, MoMA collection, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Auto
  4. ^ Christopher Light-green, MoMA collection Cubism, Origins and application of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-06-13 at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ a b c d e f one thousand h i j k l m north o p q r Christopher Light-green, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Automobile
  6. ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The Academy of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press 1985, pp. 34–42
  7. ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009
  8. ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Abstraction, Heilbrunn Timeline of Fine art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2000
  9. ^ a b Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Germination, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009 Archived 2008-10-24 at the Wayback Motorcar
  11. ^ Laurels, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A World History of Art. 7th edn. London: Laurence King Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
  12. ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. 11–221, 232, Phaidon Printing Limited 1970 in association with the Los Angeles Canton Museum of Fine art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art ISBN 0-87587-041-four
  13. ^ a b c Cooper, 24
  14. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, 14 Nov 1908, Gallica (BnF)
  15. ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Express. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Futurism in Paris – The Avant-garde Explosion, Centre Pompidou, Paris 2008
  17. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
  18. ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
  19. ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-newspaper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–ix, lx–61; repr. as 'Collage' in Art and Culture (Boston, 1961), pp. lxx–83
  20. ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
  21. ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2008.
  22. ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March xviii, 1910.
  23. ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Center of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, The University of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, Academy of Washington Press
  24. ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
  25. ^ "Eiffel Belfry". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on Feb 28, 2014.
  26. ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". www.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016.
  27. ^ a b "Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Faddy in the Current Fine art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Attempt to Exercise". October eight, 1911. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
  28. ^ a b "The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911 (High-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
  29. ^ Philadelphia Museum of Fine art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 Archived 2017-09-eighteen at the Wayback Automobile
  30. ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Woman with a Equus caballus, oil on sail, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on January 15, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, Academy of Chicago Printing, 2008, pp. 293–295
  32. ^ Carol A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Spain, 1898–1936, University of Chicago Press, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
  33. ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Art – ACCA
  34. ^ Mercè Vidal, L'exposició d'Art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
  35. ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of War: The Avant-garde and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale University Press, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
  36. ^ "Exposició d'Fine art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
  37. ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Automobile (Barcelona) 18 April 1912, Any 22, núm. 4637–4652 (xvi–xxx abr. 1912)
  38. ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912 (includes numerous articles on the artists and exhibition)
  39. ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale Academy Printing, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
  40. ^ Cubist caricature, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (three maig 1912)
  41. ^ a b "[Exposició d'Art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
  42. ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
  43. ^ "Le Periodical". Gallica. October five, 1912. Archived from the original on September four, 2015.
  44. ^ a b Journal officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, 3 Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Archives de l'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine. ISSN 1270-5942
  45. ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand fifty'art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an account of the debate.
  46. ^ "biography". www.peterbrooke.org.uk. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
  47. ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September eighteen, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-18.
  48. ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. five". Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  49. ^ "La Department d'Or, Numéro spécial, 9 Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on Apr 3, 2017.
  50. ^ Cooper, twenty–27
  51. ^ a b c d east f g Robbins, Daniel (April xix, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Internet Archive.
  52. ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac's influence, referring to Metzinger'south "precision in the cut of his cubes..."
  53. ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
  54. ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
  55. ^ "Mercure de France : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. December i, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  56. ^ a b Cottington, David (April 19, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester University Press. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on Jan 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Christopher Green, Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
  58. ^ "The Museum of Modern Art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  59. ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.M.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
  60. ^ Archive, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Study". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
  61. ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Art Institute of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
  62. ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–x, Head of a Adult female, statuary, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Machine, Bluish Mountain Project, Princeton Academy
  63. ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Art History ii (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
  64. ^ Balas, Edith (Apr 19, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture. American Philosophical Social club. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on Jan ane, 2016 – via Google Books.
  65. ^ a b Compages and cubism. Centre canadien d'architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture : MIT Press. April nineteen, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open up WorldCat.
  66. ^ a b c "The Drove | MoMA". The Museum of Modernistic Fine art. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012.
  67. ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Design in the Offset Machine Age (London, 1960), p. 203
  68. ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. 10–11. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-7
  69. ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 2, 2013.
  70. ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-xiii at the Wayback Motorcar
  71. ^ Kubistische werken op de Armory Prove Archived 2013-03-thirteen at the Wayback Machine
  72. ^ "Particular of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family papers and Armory Show records, 1859-1984, bulk 1900-1949". www.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  73. ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of modern art: at the Arsenal of the 60-ninth Infantry". Association of American Painters and Sculptors. Apr 19, 1913 – via Internet Archive.
  74. ^ Green, Christopher (January i, 2000). Fine art in France, 1900-1940. Yale Academy Press. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on November xxx, 2016 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Greenish, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky's staircase in the dwelling of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved eighteen December 2012.
  76. ^ King, Aestheticus (14 April 2011). "Jacques Doucet's Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  77. ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in France, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale Academy Press. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on xxx April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  78. ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Mod Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. 5. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on thirty April 2016. Retrieved xviii December 2012.
  79. ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. 9. ISBN978-80-7281-469-5.
  80. ^ "Cubism". www.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  81. ^ "Cubist architecture". world wide web.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on xi September 2015. Retrieved i September 2015.
  82. ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". www.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on eight Oct 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  83. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Poetry of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-xix. Retrieved 2011-06-xi .
  84. ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Championship Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-eleven .
  85. ^ "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
  86. ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-4.

Further reading [edit]

  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstract Art, New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1936.
  • Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Affect of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-4-4.
  • Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in association with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art & the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art. ISBN0-87587-041-4.
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
  • John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Assay, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
  • Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Insubordinate 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-1
  • Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The University of Chicago Press, 2008
  • Christopher Greenish, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–28, Yale University Printing, New Haven and London, 1987
  • Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Popular-Art. Translated and with an Introduction by David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian by Iskusstvo, 1968)
  • Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Fine art Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, (Wintertime 1981)
  • Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Section d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'art, Paris, 2000
  • Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Architecture in Prague, 2004

External links [edit]

  • Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Fine art History, Metropolitan Museum of Fine art
  • Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du One thousand Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
  • Czech Cubist Architecture
  • Cubism, Guggenheim Collection Online
  • Index of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Research Middle for Modernistic Fine art, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Fashion: Mainstreaming Modernism after the Armory, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. 1 (Spring 2014), pp. one–28. doi:10.1086/675687

lyoneftees.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism

0 Response to "What Is the Definition of Cubism Space in Art"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel